Gino Jennings Highlights the Bible’s Missing Books: Why We Only Have 66 Instead of 84
Renowned pastor and theologian Gino Jennings has sparked a profound discussion about the history of the Bible and the exclusion of certain texts.
During a recent sermon, Jennings showcased an ancient Bible dating back to 1611, which contains more than the standard 66 books commonly found in modern versions. He argued that the removal of these texts, often referred to as “The Lost Books” or “Apocrypha,” was a deliberate act by the Catholic Church to control the narrative of Scripture.
The Lost Books and Their Historical Context
Jennings began by addressing the misconception surrounding the term “Lost Books.” These texts were not physically misplaced but rather excluded from the canon by religious authorities over centuries.
Many of these books, such as The Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus, Tobit, Judith, and the First and Second Books of Maccabees, were part of early Hebrew Scriptures and widely recognized during the time of Jesus and the apostles. They contain historical, moral, and spiritual teachings that complement the 66 books of the Bible.
Jennings emphasized that the Bible often references these additional texts, proving their significance. For instance, the Book of Numbers mentions “The Book of the Wars of the Lord,” while 2 Samuel refers to “The Book of Jasher.” These references highlight that the authors of Scripture considered these works valuable, yet they are missing from the modern canon.
\
The Role of the Catholic Church in Excluding Books
Jennings pointed to the Catholic Church as the primary institution responsible for removing these texts. He claimed that during the development of the Biblical canon, the Church intentionally excluded certain books to shape the theological and doctrinal narrative. The final result was the 66-book version of the Bible that most Christians recognize today.
However, earlier versions of the Bible, including the 1611 King James Version Jennings displayed, included these books. Jennings argued that this omission has led to a loss of historical and spiritual context, which is vital for a fuller understanding of God’s Word.
Restoring the Integrity of Scripture
Jennings’s approach to the excluded texts is rooted in his belief that the Holy Scriptures were meant to be a complete collection. He highlighted the importance of these books in providing deeper insight into wisdom, faith, prophecy, and human struggles with sin and righteousness. By including these texts in his teachings, Jennings aims to restore what he views as the integrity of the Bible.
He also addressed the skeptics who questioned the inclusion of these books, urging them to study their historical and spiritual relevance. By cross-referencing the 66 books with the Apocrypha and other excluded texts, Jennings demonstrated their interconnectedness and the broader narrative they form.
Public Reaction and Theological Implications
Jennings’s revelations have sparked widespread interest and debate. Many followers appreciate his efforts to shed light on a lesser-known aspect of Biblical history, while others remain skeptical about reintroducing these texts into mainstream theology. Jennings’s sermons challenge believers to rethink the completeness of the modern Bible and consider the value of the excluded books.
Conclusion
Gino Jennings’s focus on the ancient Bible and its missing books underscores the complexities of Biblical history and the role of tradition in shaping Scripture. His arguments invite believers to explore the Apocrypha and other excluded texts to gain a deeper understanding of their faith. By doing so, Jennings hopes to restore a fuller, richer picture of the Word of God. His teachings remind us that the Bible, as we know it, has undergone centuries of evolution, and understanding its history is crucial to appreciating its message.
